Top latest Five h4831 vs h4831sc Urban news
Top latest Five h4831 vs h4831sc Urban news
Blog Article
I picked up a 50ct. box of 160 Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn up the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is fifty bullets. But I really need to locate a bullet from the a hundred and sixty course that my more mature rifle likes.
Naturally, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of various ton figures, but I do think I realize why. It is a litigation-pushed world, plus some fool would definitely deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his individual custom mixture of powder. What a entire world.
The fact that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is specifically why you happen to be viewing better velocities received with that powder, rather than what you've found While using the IMR things. Also good powder, but fairly improved suited to slightly smaller sized circumstances that has a little bit much less capability.
Minnesota H4831SC is my head over to in the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am preserving the tiny I've left for drop 2021. I would commence minimal and perform your way up, according to what load data you evaluate for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.
Yup or it will not function very well. And For the reason that OP includes a load applying Varget I'd attempt to locate somebody to trade with. May well come up with a earn acquire problem.
Due to the fact there won't look like any "Formal" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can several of you present a place to begin with this mixture and factors to think about when Functioning this Load up?
I am using it using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. RL22 did nicely but I used to be a bit concerned about temp security. I do think I am at 72 grains and get close to 2850ish fps
and you should spend money on some new load data textbooks. powder composition and chemistry can does adjust over the years. 4831 powder of several years ago isn't same as what exactly is available. which is why someone serious about reloading securely may have essentially the most recent load data guides to check with.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take full advantage of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Intense powder.
Ballistically, this Extraordinary Extruded powder is the precise copy of h4831sc H4831. Physically, it has a shorter grain dimension, as a result, the designation SC or limited Slice. The shorter, more compact kernels enable the powder to flow with the powder measures a lot more easily, helping to relieve the continual chopping of granules.
Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're absolutely different powders, with IMR 4831 currently being significantly more quickly when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Never take care of them as exactly the same powder, because they most absolutely are not.
This is often an extreme extruded propellant and delivers heightened insensitivity to hot and cold temperatures.
Both equally provide h4831sc the Exact same melt away fee, shorter Minimize is available in helpful If you're at max fill and never at strain/velocity you want you can find more shortcut inside a case.
IMR4831 and h4831sc H4831SC are unique. Wherever you will be puzzling it and thinking that it's shut is H4831 and H4831SC are really very similar. People two are virtually the identical except H4831SC is built to scaled-down grains so it meters less difficult.